Obama v. Naracon et al

Filing 42

ORDER: The Court adopts the partial recommendations, 9 & 30 and overrules Obama's objections, 14 & 33 . Obama has not presented any facts showing that his constitutional rights have been violated or that he is in imminent danger of irrep arable harm. Obama's motion for temporary restraining order, 20 , is denied. Obama's motions to amend his complaint, 15 & 22 , are denied. His proposed claims are unrelated to those in his original complaint and are too remote from the events at issue. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/10/2015. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION

ISHMAEL HASSAN OBAMA
ADC #145160

v.

PLAINTIFF

No.1:14-cv-136-DPM-BD

NICHOLAS NARACON, ADC, Grimes Unit;
BRADLEY HOWARD ROBERTSON, Sergeant,
Grimes Unit; WILLIAM WIESENBACH, JR.,
Corporal, ADC; WILLIAM DAVIDSON, Corporal,
ADC; MICHAEL MORRIS, Corporal, ADC;
and RICHARD LEE, Lieutenant, Grimes Unit

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
On de novo review, the Court adopts the partial recommendations, NQ 9
& NQ 30, and overrules Obama's objections, NQ 14 & NQ 33. Obama has not

presented any facts showing that his constitutional rights have been violated
or that he is in imminent danger of irreparable harm. Verbal threats are not
enough. McDowell v. Jones, 990 F.2d 433,434 (8th Cir. 1993). Obama' s motion
for temporary restraining order, NQ 20, is denied. Obama' s motions to amend
his complaint, NQ 15 & NQ 22, are denied. Wishon v. Gammon, 978 F.2d 446,448
(8th Cir. 1992). His proposed claims are unrelated to those in his original
complaint and are too remote from the events at issue.

So Ordered.
/I

D.P. Marshall Jr&
United States District Judge

-2-