Johnson v. Paige et al
ORDER approving and adopting 77 80 Proposed Findings and Recommendation in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; denying 73 motion for declaratory judgment; granting 64 motion for summary judgment; and dismissing Mr. Johnson's claims against defendants Haley, Faust, Evans, and Hutchinson without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 02/22/2016. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WILBERT LEZELL JOHNSON
Case No. 1:14-cv-00163 KGB
JOE PAIGE, et al.
The Court has reviewed two separate Proposed Findings and Recommendation submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris, as well as plaintiff Wilbert Lezell Johnson’s
objections (Dkt. Nos. 77, 80, 82, 83). After careful review of these documents and a de novo
review of the record, the Court concludes that the first Proposed Findings and Recommendation
(Dkt. No. 77) and the second Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 80) should be,
and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
It is, therefore, ordered that:
Mr. Johnson’s motion for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief is denied
(Dkt. No. 73).
Separate defendants Peggy Haley, Nurzuhal Faust, Marvin Evans, and Chelsie
Hutchinson’s motion for summary judgment is granted, and Mr. Johnson’s claims against
defendants Haley, Faust, Evans, and Hutchinson are dismissed without prejudice (Dkt. No. 64).
Dated this the 22nd day of February, 2016.
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?