Ganther v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
ORDER adopting the partial recommendation, 8 , as modified and rejecting Ganther's objection, 9 , in part. The Court orders service on Drs. Hughes, Kirk, and Ware through the Humphries and Odum law firm. Ganther has until 30 June 2015 to file a motion for service listing any other doctors or nurses with their addresses and roles. The ADC is dismissed with prejudice as a defendant. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order will not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/30/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION;
HUGES} Doctor, McPherson Unit, ADC; and
DOES, Doctors, Wrightville Unit, ADC and
Doctors, McPherson Unit
On de novo review, the Court adopts the partial recommendation, NQ 8,
as modified and rejects Ganther's objection, NQ 9, in part.
R. CIV. P.
72(b)(3). The Court construes Ganther's objection listing the names of the
Wrightsville doctors as a motion for service. The Court therefore orders
service on Drs. Hughes, Kirk, and Ware through the Humphries and Odum
law firm. Ganther' s objection did not list any additional doctors at the
McPherson Unit. If she intended to name other doctors or nurses, she has
until30 June 2015 to file a motion for service listing their names and addresses
The Arkansas Department of Correction is dismissed with prejudice as
The Court directs the Clerk to change the name from Huges to Hughes.
a defendant. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order will not be taken in
good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
D.P. Marshall J .
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?