Loosey v. Lawarence et al
ORDER approving and adopting 16 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 9 Defendants' motion to dismiss; dismissing without prejudice the remaining claims in plaintif f Noel Gene Loosey's 2 complaint; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 5/22/2015. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NOEL GENE LOOSEY
Case No. 1:15-cv-00008-KGB-JWC
TATE LAWRENCE et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Jerry W. Cavaneau (Dkt. No. 16). No objections have been filed,
and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes
that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
It is therefore ordered that:
Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted (Dkt. No. 9), and the remaining claims
in plaintiff Noel Gene Loosey’s complaint are dismissed without prejudice (Dkt. No. 2).
This dismissal counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and
Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
SO ORDERED this 22nd day of May, 2015.
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?