Lyons v. Morrison et al
OPINION AND ORDER denying Lyons' motion to consolidate 3 . Lyons' complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. If Lyons wishes to reopen this case, she must, within thirty days of the entry of this Opinion a nd Order, pay the $400 filing fee in full and file a motion to reopen. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/2/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CHANDRA LYONS, ADC #704518
NO. 1:15CV00012 JLH/JTR
MORRISON, Commissary Staff,
McPherson Unit, ADC, et al.
OPINION AND ORDER
Chandra Lyons is a prisoner in the McPherson Unit of the Arkansas Department of
Correction. She has filed a pro se § 1983 complaint and a motion to consolidate. Documents #1 and
The fee for filing a civil action in federal court is $400. Lyons has not paid that fee or filed
an application to proceed in forma pauperis.
The Prison Litigation Reform Act provides that a prisoner cannot proceed in forma pauperis
“if the prisoner has on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility,
brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that
it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the
prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Prior to filing this lawsuit on January 22, 2015, Lyons filed at least three § 1983 actions that
were dismissed for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Lyons v.
McDonald, 5:96CV00369; Lyons v. Anderson, 5:96CV00463; Lyons v. Thompson, 5:96CV00547.
Nevertheless, Lyons may proceed in forma pauperis if she falls under the “imminent danger”
exception to the three strikes rule. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (providing that three strikers should be
granted permission to proceed in forma pauperis if they are “under imminent danger of serious
physical injury”); Ashley v. Dilworth, 147 F.3d 715, 717 (8th Cir. 1998) (explaining that the
exception applies only if the prisoner is in imminent danger “at the time of filing” and that
“[a]llegations that the prisoner has faced imminent danger in the past are insufficient”).
Lyons alleges that defendants are violating her constitutional rights by improperly handling
her prisoner trust account and incorrectly charging her for items purchased at the prison commissary.
Neither of those allegations place Lyons in imminent danger of serious physical injury. Thus, it
would be futile to direct Lyons to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly,
this case will be dismissed due to Lyons’ failure to pay the filing fee. Lyons will have thirty days
to reopen this case by paying the $400 filing fee in full.
Motion to Consolidate
Lyons seeks permission to combine all the claims she has raised in ten lawsuits she has filed
in this district into one, consolidated case. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a)(2) provides that
claims against multiple defendants may be joined in one lawsuit only if the claims arise “out of the
same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions and occurrences” and involve a “question of
law or fact” that is “common to all defendants.” The claims Lyons has raised against numerous
defendants in her ten separate lawsuits are not factually or legally related. Additionally, the Eighth
Circuit has clarified that a prisoner cannot attempt to defeat the filing fee requirements in § 1915 by
joining unrelated and legally distinct claims in one lawsuit. See Bailey v. Doe, No. 11-2410, 2011
WL 5061542 (8th Cir. Oct. 26, 2011) (unpublished opinion). Accordingly, Lyons’ motion to
consolidate is denied. Document #3.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Lyons’ motion to consolidate is denied (Document #3);
Lyons’ complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failing to pay the filing fee. If
Lyons wishes to reopen this case, she must, within thirty days of the entry of this Opinion and
Order, pay the $400 filing fee in full and file a motion to reopen; and
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 2nd day of March, 2015.
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?