Rodriguez v. Page et al
ORDER adopting in their entirety the 112 proposed findings and recommendations; granting the 82 motion for summary judgment submitted by defendants Brenda Bridgeman and Melvin Nance; granting the 85 motion for summary judgment submitted by defendants Joseph Page and Aundrea Weekly; dismissing with prejudice Rodriguez's complaint; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/14/2017. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JUAN CARLOS RODRIGUEZ
CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00022 BSM
JOSEPH PAGE, et al.
The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 112] submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris have been received as well as plaintiff Juan Carlos
Rodriguez’s objection [Doc. No. 115] thereto. After de novo review, the proposed findings
and recommendations are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, the motion for summary
judgment submitted by defendants Brenda Bridgeman and Melvin Nance [Doc. No. 82] is
granted, the motion for summary judgment submitted by defendants Joseph Page and
Aundrea Weekly [Doc. No. 85] is granted, and Rodrigeuz’s complaint is dismissed with
prejudice. It is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good
faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of July 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?