Rodriguez v. Page et al

Filing 116

ORDER adopting in their entirety the 112 proposed findings and recommendations; granting the 82 motion for summary judgment submitted by defendants Brenda Bridgeman and Melvin Nance; granting the 85 motion for summary judgment submitted by defendants Joseph Page and Aundrea Weekly; dismissing with prejudice Rodriguez's complaint; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/14/2017. (ljb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION

JUAN CARLOS RODRIGUEZ
ADC #156405
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00022 BSM

JOSEPH PAGE, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 112] submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris have been received as well as plaintiff Juan Carlos
Rodriguez’s objection [Doc. No. 115] thereto. After de novo review, the proposed findings
and recommendations are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, the motion for summary
judgment submitted by defendants Brenda Bridgeman and Melvin Nance [Doc. No. 82] is
granted, the motion for summary judgment submitted by defendants Joseph Page and
Aundrea Weekly [Doc. No. 85] is granted, and Rodrigeuz’s complaint is dismissed with
prejudice. It is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good
faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of July 2017.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE