Rodriguez v. Page et al
ORDER ADOPTING in part 76 the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition; denying 50 Defendants' motion for summary judgment; granting in part 53 motion for summary judgment and only plaintiffs claim that he was not provided s ufficient catheters each week (GR-14-00394) is allowed to proceed against Brenda Bridgeman and Melvin Nance; plaintiffs remaining claims against Bridgeman and Nance are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust; and denying 64 plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/23/2016. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JUAN CARLOS RODRIGUEZ
CASE NO: 1:15CV00022 BSM
JOSEPH PAGE et al.
The proposed findings and partial recommended disposition (“PRD”) submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris and defendants’ objections thereto have
been reviewed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review
of the record, the PRD are hereby adopted in part.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 50] is denied and plaintiff’s
claims against defendants Joseph Page and Aundrea Weekly are allowed to proceed.
Summary judgment [Doc. No. 53] is granted in part and only plaintiff’s claim that he was not
provided sufficient catheters each week (GR-14-00394) is allowed to proceed against Brenda
Bridgeman and Melvin Nance; plaintiff’s remaining claims against Bridgeman and Nance
are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Finally, plaintiff’s motion for
summary judgment [Doc. No. 64] is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of August 2016.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?