Bailey v. McGalvan et al

Filing 22

Order adopting 6 20 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety; dismissing Mr. Bailey's claims against Mr. McGalvan and Mr. White; dismissing Mr. Bailey's allegation of threats by Mr. Thompson; and denying Mr. Bailey's 10 motion for preliminary injunction. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 09/02/2015. (rhm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION THOMAS DORSEY BAILEY, III, ADC #148850 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 1:15-cv-00026-KGB-JTK CHAD M. MCGALVAN, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney recommending that the Court dismiss plaintiff Thomas Dorsey Bailey, III’s claims against defendants Chad McGalvan and David White and Mr. Bailey’s allegations of threats by defendant Patrick Thompson (Dkt. No. 6). There have been no objections filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After carefully reviewing these Proposed Findings and Recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety (Dkt. No. 6). The Court has also received Proposed Findings and Recommendations from Judge Kearney recommending that the Court deny Mr. Bailey’s motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 20). There have been no objections filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful consideration, the Court adopts these Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety (Dkt. No. 20). It is therefore ordered that: 1. The Court dismisses Mr. Bailey’s claims against Mr. McGalvan and Mr. White for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. The Court dismisses Mr. Bailey’s allegation of threats by Mr. Thompson for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 3. The Court denies Mr. Bailey’s motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 10). SO ORDERED this 2nd day of September, 2015. ____________________________________ KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?