Penix v. Banks et al
Filing
10
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 9 Order that was entered on this day, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed without prejudice. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike". The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the corresponding Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/24/2015. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
CHELSEY MORNEE’ PENIX,
ADC #710547
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 1:15-cv-00032-KGB-JJV
JAMES BANKS, Senior Warden,
McPherson Unit, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is considered, ordered, and
adjudged that this case is dismissed without prejudice. Dismissal of this action constitutes a
“strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the corresponding Order
would not be taken in good faith.
SO ADJUDGED this 24th day of October, 2015.
____________________________
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?