Penix v. Banks et al
ORDER adopting 8 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in all respects; dismissing without prejudice plaintiff's 2 complaint; finding that dismissal of this case counts as a "strike"; and finding that an in forma pauperis appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/24/2015. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CHELSEY MORNEE’ PENIX,
Case No. 1:15-cv-00032-KGB-JJV
JAMES BANKS, Senior Warden,
McPherson Unit, et al.
The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Joe Volpe (Dkt. No. 8). No objections were filed, and the time for filing
objections has passed. After careful review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, the
Court adopts them in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
Accordingly, the Court dismisses without prejudice plaintiff’s complaint for failure to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted (Dkt. No. 2). Dismissal of this case counts as a
“strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Based on 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an in forma pauperis appeal of this Order would not be
taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of November, 2015.
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?