Murphy et al v. Banks et al

Filing 85

ORDER adopting 81 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 75 motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs' claims against Defendants Faust, Joseph Heier, Ming, West, and Cas e are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/22/2015. (ks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
LISA RYAN MURPHY,
ADC # 760343; et al.
v.

PLAINTIFFS

No. 1:15CV00033-JLH-JJV

BANKS, Warden,
Grimes Unit, ADC; et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s objections. After carefully
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the
Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted
in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:

1.

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 75) is GRANTED.

2.

Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants Faust, Joseph Heier, Ming, West, and

Case are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
3.

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma

pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this 22nd day of September, 2015.

___________________________________
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE