McGraw v. Hobbs et al

Filing 48

ORDER adopting 32 Recommendation. McGraw may proceed on his claims against Defendants Evans and Banks based on his prejudice because they don't meet the imminent-danger exception. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/28/2015. (ks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
RAMON HOSEA McGRAW
ADC # 142102

v.

PLAINTIFF

No. 1:15-cv-35-DPM-BD

RAY HOBBS, Administrative Director
Pine Bluff Cental Office, et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
On de novo review, the Court adopts the recommendation, NQ 32, and
overrules McGraw's objections, NQ 33. FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b)(3). McGraw may
proceed on his claims against Defendants Evans and Banks based on his
current housing situation. McGraw's remaining claims are dismissed without
prejudice because they don't meet the imminent-danger exception. 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(g).

So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jrf
United States District Judge