Coe v. White et al
Filing
48
ORDER adopting 47 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Defendant Rick Gillespie's 20 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Religious Land Use and I nstitutionalized Persons Act and free exercise claims against Defendant Rick Gillespie are DISMISSED with prejudice. All other claims in Plaintiff's 32 Amended Complaint are DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/20/2015. (ks)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
JOHN DAVID COE, ADC # 652804
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 1:15CV00037-JLH-JJV
DAVID WHITE, Warden,
North Central Unit, ADC; et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all
respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.
Defendant Rick Gillespie’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 20) is
GRANTED.
2.
Plaintiff’s Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act and free exercise
claims against Defendant Rick Gillespie are DISMISSED with prejudice.
3.
All other claims in Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 32) are DISMISSED
without prejudice.
4.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this 20th day of July, 2015.
_________________________________
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?