Johnson v. Richard et al
Filing
7
ORDER ADOPTING 4 Partial Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's retaliation, disciplinary and grievance claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Defendants Baker, Banister, Faust, Banks, Evans, Naylor, Lawrence and Griffin are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 5/22/2015. (mcz)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
WILBERT LEZELL JOHNSON,
ADC #84494
v.
PLAINTIFF
1:15CV00056-JM-JTK
RICHARD, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those
proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that
1.
Plaintiff’s retaliation, disciplinary, and grievance claims are DISMISSED without
prejudice.
2.
Defendants Baker, Banister, Faust, Banks, Evans, Naylor, Lawrence, and Griffin, are
DISMISSED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of May, 2015.
______________________________________
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
