Johnson v. Richard et al
ORDER adopting 75 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; denying Plaintiff's 17 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; and denying Plaintiff's 69 Motion for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief, which this Court construes as a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 12/7/2015. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WILBERT LEZELL JOHNSON,
RICHARD, et al.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and
recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the
record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motions for Preliminary Injunction (Doc.
No. 17), and for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief, which this Court construes as a Motion
for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 69) are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of December, 2015.
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?