Hinton v. Brandon et al

Filing 8

ORDER adopting 3 recommendation and overruling Hinton's objection, 7 . Hinton's complaint will be dismissed with prejudice. This dismissal counts as a "strike". An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. The Court directs the Clerk to make a copy of 7 , and he requested, and send it to Hinton with this Order. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/28/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION VIJON HINTON ADC #659422 v. PLAINTIFF No. 1:15-cv-58-DPM-JWC CHRIS BRANDON, Officer, North Central Unit; JUSTINE MINOR, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, ADC; and DAVID WHITE, Warden, North Central Unit DEFENDANTS ORDER On de novo review, the Court adopts the recommendation, NQ 3, and overrules Hinton's objection, NQ 7. Hinton's complaint will be dismissed with prejudice. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not betakeningoodfaith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). The Court directs the Clerk to make a copy of NQ 7, as he requested, and send it to Hinton with this Order. So Ordered. 1/ D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?