Jarrett v. Hearyman et al
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to prepare summonses for each of the named Defendants. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve copies of the complaint, with any attachments, and a summons for these Defendants without prepayment of fees and costs or security. The Motion, 3 , is denied at this time. Mr. Jarrett may file another motion to correct if necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 5/12/2015. (jak)(Docket text modified on 5/12/2015 to correct the Judge who signed the Order). (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CASE NO. 1:15-CV-59 JM/BD
MARTY HEARYMAN, et al.
Terrance Jarrett, an Arkansas Department of Correction inmate, filed this lawsuit
pro se alleging that the named Defendants have acted with deliberate indifference to his
medical needs. (Docket entry #2) Based on the allegations contained in his complaint,
Mr. Jarrett has stated an eighth amendment claim against the named Defendants.
Accordingly, service is proper.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to prepare summonses for each of the named
Defendants. The United States Marshal is directed to serve copies of the complaint, with
any attachments (docket entry #2), and a summons for these Defendants without requiring
prepayment of fees and costs or security. Service for these Defendants should be through
the Arkansas Department of Correction Compliance Division, P.O. Box 20550, Pine
Bluff, Arkansas 71612.
In addition, Mr. Jarrett has moved for the Clerk of the Court to correct the spelling
of Defendant Hearyman’s name. (#3) Based on Mr. Jarrett’s motion, however, the Court
is unclear if the proper spelling of this Defendant’s last name is Hearyman or Heartman.
Accordingly, the motion (#3) is DENIED, at this time. Mr. Jarrett may file another
motion to correct if necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 12th day of May, 2015.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?