Ivy v. Stone County Detention Center et al

Filing 9

ORDER approving and adopting the 8 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's 2 complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; finding that dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike"; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/03/2015. (rhm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION ROBERT EARL IVY, ADC #650478 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 1:15-cv-00061-KGB/JTK STONE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 8). No objections have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful review, the Court approves and adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. It is, therefore, ordered that: 1. Plaintiff’s complaint against defendants is dismissed without prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. SO ORDERED this 3rd day of December, 2015. ______________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?