Burgess v. Sherrod et al
Filing
88
ORDER adopting 85 unopposed recommendation; denying 69 Burgess's motion for summary judgment; granting 70 Bailey, Counts, and Hanney's joint motion for summary judgment and dismissing with prejudice all of Burgess's claims agains t them; denying 74 Defendant Sherrod's motion for summary judgment. The Court will hold a bench trial on Burgess's remaining claim against Sherrod on 10/30/2017 at 9:30 a.m. A Final Scheduling Order will issue soon. The Court ask Magistrate Judge Harris to appoint counsel to represent Burgess. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/28/2016. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
WILLIAM BURGESS
ADC #127925
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 1:15-cv-67-DPM-PSH
BRIAN SHERROD, Deputy, Sharp
County Jail; CODY BAILEY, Deputy,
Sharp County Jail; STAN HANNEY, Jail
Administrator, Sharp County Jail; and
MARK COUNTS, Sheriff, Sharp County
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
1. Unopposed recommendation, Ng 85, adopted.
FED.
R. Crv. P. 72(b)
(1983 addition to advisory committee notes). Burgess's motion for summary
judgment, Ng 69, is denied. Bailey, Counts, and Hanney' s joint motion for
summary judgment, Ng 70, is granted. All Burgess's claims against them are
dismissed with
prejudice.
Defendant Sherrod' s motion for summary
judgment, Ng 74, is denied.
2. The Court will hold a bench trial on Burgess's remaining claim
against Sherrod on 30 October 2017 at 9:30 a.m. A Final Scheduling Order
will issue soon. The Court asks Magistrate Judge Harris to appoint counsel
to represent Burgess.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jf
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?