Roberts et al v. Unimin Corporation

Filing 73

FORMAL ORDER from the Arkansas Supreme Court denying Appellee's Motion to Reconsider. (ljb)

-FORMAL ORDER

FILED

U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT A~KAN8

STATE OF ARKANSAS,

SCT.
SUPREME COURT

JAMES W. Mc 0

By: _ _ _-.11--""~~~~

BE IT REMEMBERED, THAT A SESSION OF THE SUPREME COURT
BEGUN AND HELD JN THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ON JULY 21, 2016, AMONGST
OTHERS WERE THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDINGS, TO-WIT:

SUPREME COURT CASE NO. CV-16-375
KATHY ROBERTS AND KAREN MCSHANE

APPELLANTS

V. AN ORIGINAL ACTION, FROM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN
DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS - 1:15-CV-00071-JLH
UNIMIN CORPORATION

APPELLEE

APPELLEE'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER IS DENIED. BRILL. C.J., AND
DANIELSON AND WYNNE . .J.J., WOULD GRANT.

IN TESTIMONY, THAT THE ABOVE IS A TRUE COPY OF
THE ORDER OF SAID SUPREME COURT, RENDERED IN
TIIE CASE HEREIN STATED, I, STACEY PECTOL,
CLERK OF SAID SUPREME COURT, HEREUNTO
SET MY HAND AND AFFIX THE SEAL OF SAID
SUPREME COURT, AT MY OFFICE IN THE CITY OF
LITTLE ROCK, THIS 21 s r DAY OF JULY, 2016.

BY: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEPUTY CLERK
ORIGINAL TO CLERK
CC: BARRET S. MOORE AND ROBERT D. STROUD
BENJAMIN R. ASKEW, JOHN G. SIMON, AND KEVIN M. CARNIE, JR.
HONORABLE J. LEON HOLMES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE