Johnson v. Baker et al

Filing 26

ORDER adopting the 24 proposed findings and partial recommended disposition in all respects and denying 23 Johnson's motion for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/16/2015. (rhm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION WILBERT LEZELL JOHNSON ADC #84494 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 1:15CV00081 BSM BAKER et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and partial recommended disposition (“PRD”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and plaintiff Wilbert Johnson’s objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration of these documents and a de novo review of the record, the PRD are hereby adopted in all respects and Johnson’s motion for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief [Doc. No. 23] is denied. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT SO ORDERED this 16th day of November 2015. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?