Johnson v. Baker et al

Filing 39

ORDER adopting 38 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; directing the clerk to correct the docket to reflect defendant "Baker" is "Clinton Baker;" granting 33 Defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismi ssing, with prejudice, defendants Clinton Baker, Terrie Bannister, Banks, Raymond Naylor, and Jada Lawrence; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/16/2016. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
WILBERT LEZELL JOHNSON
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 1:15CV00081 BSM

BAKER, Sergeant, Grimes Unit; et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
The proposed findings and recommended disposition (“RD”) submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe have been reviewed. No objections have been filed.
After careful consideration, the RD are hereby adopted in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.

The clerk correct the docket to reflect defendant “Baker” is “Clinton Baker.”

2.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 33] is granted and

defendants Clinton Baker, Terrie Bannister, Banks, Raymond Naylor, and Jada Lawrence are
dismissed with prejudice.
3.

It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma

pauperis appeal from this order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good
faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of May 2016.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE