Johnson v. Baker et al
ORDER adopting 38 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; directing the clerk to correct the docket to reflect defendant "Baker" is "Clinton Baker;" granting 33 Defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismi ssing, with prejudice, defendants Clinton Baker, Terrie Bannister, Banks, Raymond Naylor, and Jada Lawrence; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/16/2016. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WILBERT LEZELL JOHNSON
CASE NO. 1:15CV00081 BSM
BAKER, Sergeant, Grimes Unit; et al.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition (“RD”) submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe have been reviewed. No objections have been filed.
After careful consideration, the RD are hereby adopted in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
The clerk correct the docket to reflect defendant “Baker” is “Clinton Baker.”
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 33] is granted and
defendants Clinton Baker, Terrie Bannister, Banks, Raymond Naylor, and Jada Lawrence are
dismissed with prejudice.
It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma
pauperis appeal from this order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good
IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of May 2016.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?