Elmore v. Correct Care Solutions et al

Filing 74

ORDER ADOPTING 70 Partial Recommended Disposition. Mr. Elmore's 51 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Defendants' 56 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; Mr. Elmore's claims agains t Defendant Hearyman are limited to Defendant Hearyman's treatment of Mr. Elmore's stomach complaints from 6/25/2015 until 9/15/2015; Mr. Elmore's claims against Defendant Hayden are limited in time from 6/30/2015 until 7/14/2015; and the claims against Defendants Stieve and Floss are DISMISSED, without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 7/20/2016. (mcz)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
JEFFERY CHARLES ELMORE,
ADC # 91418
V.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00111 JM/BD

CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
The Court has received a Partial Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”)
filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation, the
timely objections filed by Defendants Floss, Stieve, Hearyman, and Haydon, as well as a
de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be,
and hereby is, approved in part and modified in part and adopted as this Court’s findings
as modified.
Mr. Elmore’s motion for summary judgment (#51) is DENIED. Defendants’
motion for partial summary judgment (#56) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part:
Mr. Elmore’s claims against Defendant Hearyman are limited to Defendant Hearyman’s
treatment of Mr. Elmore’s stomach complaints from June 25, 2015 until September 15,
2015; Mr. Elmore’s claims against Defendant Hayden are limited in time from June 30,
2015 until July 14, 2015; and the claims against Defendants Stieve and Floss are
DISMISSED, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 20th day of July, 2016.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE