Murphy v. Banks et al
ORDER dismissing without prejudice the 1 Complaint. If Murphy wants to pursue this case, then she must pay the $400 filing and administrative fees and file a motion to reopen the case by 4 December 2015. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment will not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/4/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
LISA RYAN MURPHY,
JIMMY BANKS, Warden,
Grimes Unit, ADC, et al.
Murphy hasn't paid the filing and administrative fees in this case. And
a motion to proceed in forma pauperis would be futile because Murphy is a
three-striker. Before filing this lawsuit, she had at least three cases dismissed
for failing to state a claim. E.g., Murphy v. Fisk, et al., 1:15-cv-50-BSM; Murphy
v. Culclager, et al., 1:15-cv-27-BSM; Murphy v. Robinson, et al., 1:15-cv-47-JM.
Nothing in Murphy's new complaint suggests she's currently in imminent
danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Her complaint will
therefore be dismissed without prejudice.
If Murphy wants to pursue this case, then she must pay $400 (the filing
and administrative fees) and file a motion to reopen the case by 4 December
2015. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying
Judgment will not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?