Murphy v. Banks et al

Filing 2

ORDER dismissing without prejudice the 1 Complaint. If Murphy wants to pursue this case, then she must pay the $400 filing and administrative fees and file a motion to reopen the case by 4 December 2015. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment will not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/4/2015. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
LISA RYAN MURPHY,
ADC #760343
v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 1:15-cv-116-DPM

JIMMY BANKS, Warden,
Grimes Unit, ADC, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

Murphy hasn't paid the filing and administrative fees in this case. And
a motion to proceed in forma pauperis would be futile because Murphy is a
three-striker. Before filing this lawsuit, she had at least three cases dismissed
for failing to state a claim. E.g., Murphy v. Fisk, et al., 1:15-cv-50-BSM; Murphy
v. Culclager, et al., 1:15-cv-27-BSM; Murphy v. Robinson, et al., 1:15-cv-47-JM.

Nothing in Murphy's new complaint suggests she's currently in imminent
danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Her complaint will
therefore be dismissed without prejudice.
If Murphy wants to pursue this case, then she must pay $400 (the filing

and administrative fees) and file a motion to reopen the case by 4 December
2015. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying
Judgment will not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

So Ordered.

-2-