Thomas v. Banks et al

Filing 10

ORDER granting 9 Motion. Mr. Thomas's claims regarding his mental health treatment is dismissed, without prejudice. In addition, his claims against Defendants Banks, Page, Robertson, Cantrell, and Durham are dismissed, without prejudice. The C lerk of Court is directed to prepare summonses for Defendants Milgram, Tate, and Campbell. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve copies of the complaint, with any attachments, and summonses for these Defendants without requiring prepayment of fees and costs or security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 12/18/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION DATRICK THOMAS, ADC #155115 V. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 1:15-CV-118 JM/BD JIMMY BANKS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Mr. Thomas has moved to dismiss his claim regarding the Defendants’ failure to address his mental health needs. (Docket entry #9) In addition, he has moved to dismiss his claims against Defendants Banks, Page, Robertson, Cantrell, and Durham. The motion (#9) is GRANTED. Mr. Thomas’s claim regarding his mental health treatment is DISMISSED, without prejudice. In addition, his claims against Defendants Banks, Page, Robertson, Cantrell, and Durham are DISMISSED, without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to prepare summonses for Defendants Milgram, Tate, and Campbell. The United States Marshal is directed to serve copies of the complaint, with any attachments (#2), and summonses for these Defendants without requiring prepayment of fees and costs or security. Service for these Defendants should be through the Arkansas Department of Correction Compliance Division, P.O. Box 20550, Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71612. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 18th day of December, 2015. ___________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?