Finley v. Baumgardner et al
ORDER adopting 77 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Defendant Baumgardner's 73 Motion for Summary Judgment on liability is granted. Plaintiff's 14 Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 3/7/2017. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CLAUDE EDWARD FINLEY
J. BAUMGARDNER, Sergeant,
North Central Unit; et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Defendant Baumgardner’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability (Doc. No. 73)
Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 14) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from any Order adopting these recommendations would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 7th day of March, 2017.
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?