Murphy v. Banks et al
ORDER ADOPTING 4 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition: Plaintiff's 1 Application to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, and her 2 Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If Plaintiff wishes to continue, she must submit the fi ling and administrative fee of $400 within 30 days of this case's dismissal, along with a motion to reopen the case. Plaintiff's 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/29/2016. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
LISA RYAN MURPHY
NO: 1:15CV00132 JM
JIMMY BANKS et al
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma paupeirs (Docket No. 1) is
DENIED, and her complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If plaintiff wishes to
continue this case, she must submit the filing and administrative fees of $400.00 to the Clerk of the
Court, noting the above case style number, within thirty days of the case’s dismissal, along with a
motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, this case will be reopened.
Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel (Docket No. 3) is DENIED.
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and
judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 29th day of January, 2016.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?