Murphy v. Nunley et al
Filing
12
ORDER that the Clerk shall prepare summons and the USM shall serve Defendants Nunley, Hall, Baumgardner, and Lad without prepayment fees or costs or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 3/18/2016. (lej)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
LISA RYAN MURPHY, ADC # 760343
v.
PLAINTIFF
1:16CV00007-DPM-JJV
NUNLEY, Nurse,
McPherson Unit; et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Having reviewed Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 9) for screening purposes,1 the
Court concludes service is appropriate for Defendants Nunley, Hall, Baumgardner, and Lad.
Plaintiff has not provided first names for any of these Defendants. Nevertheless, service will be
attempted based on their last names and job titles.2 Each is a nurse at the Arkansas Department of
Correction McPherson Unit.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall prepare Summons for these
Defendants and the United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the Amended Complaint (Doc. No.
9), Summons, and this Order on them without prepayment fees or costs or security therefore. Service
for each of these Defendants should be through Humphries, Odum and Eubanks Law Firm, P.O. Box
20670, White Hall, AR 71612.
DATED this 18th day of March, 2016.
____________________________________
JOE J. VOLPE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
The Prison Litigation Reform Act requires federal courts to screen prisoner complaints
seeking relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. 28 U.S.C. Sect. 1915A(a).
2
If these summons are rejected for lack of identifying information, the burden shall fall to
Plaintiff to provide full names for these Defendants.
1
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?