Murphy v. Nunley et al
Filing 18
ORDER adopting the recommendation with one clarification, 13 , and overruling Murphy's objections 17 . The clarification: there are two Defendants Richardson mentioned in the amended complaint - Cassy Richardson and Lieutenant M. Richardson. B ut Magistrate Judge Volpe's analysis applies equally to both, 13 . Murphy's false-disciplinary claim is dismissed without prejudice. Because of her status as a three-striker, Murphy must pay the $400 filing and administrative fees if she wants to pursue this claim. Murphy's remaining claims against Banks, Culclager, Engler, Clark, Lassiter, Corizon Medical Services, Fauster, Hutchinson, Warshaw, Hughes, Bledso, Biaca, Dixon, Morin, Williams, Wayland, Reid, M. Richardson, Ca ssy Richardson, Aiken, Johnson, Dykes, Pritchard, Golden, Kelley, Payne, Ayers, Ming, and Dunavion are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. An in forma pauperis from this Order will not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/5/2016. (jak)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
