Buck v. Kelly et al
ORDER adopting 91 the partial recommended disposition; granting 68 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing without prejudice plaintiff Larry Buck's § 1983 inadequate medical care claim against defendant Robert Reichard, and dismissing with prejudice Buck's medical malpractice claim under state law against Reichard; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/23/2017. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
LARRY L. BUCK
CASE NO. 1:16-CV-00026 BSM
ROBERT REICHARD, et al.
The partial recommended disposition (“PRD”) submitted by United States Magistrate
Judge J. Thomas Ray [Doc. No. 91] and plaintiff Larry Buck’s objections [Doc. No. 92] have
been reviewed. After reviewing the record, the PRD is adopted.
Accordingly, Buck’s § 1983 inadequate medical care claim against defendant Robert
Reichard is dismissed without prejudice, and Buck’s medical malpractice claim under state
law against Reichard is dismissed with prejudice. It is certified that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of May 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?