Clark v. Robertson et al

Filing 66

ORDER adopting in their entirety 62 the proposed findings and recommendation; and denying 54 the defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution. A new scheduling order will follow. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/27/2017. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
SEYOUM ALI CLARK
ADC #120783
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 1:16-CV-00083 BSM

BRADLEY HOWARD ROBERTSON, et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
The proposed findings and partial recommendation [Doc. No. 62] submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris have been received, and after careful consideration,
they are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, the defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack
of prosecution [Doc. No. 54] is denied. A new scheduling order will follow.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of November 2017.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE