Clark v. Robertson et al
ORDER adopting in their entirety 62 the proposed findings and recommendation; and denying 54 the defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution. A new scheduling order will follow. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/27/2017. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
SEYOUM ALI CLARK
CASE NO. 1:16-CV-00083 BSM
BRADLEY HOWARD ROBERTSON, et al.
The proposed findings and partial recommendation [Doc. No. 62] submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris have been received, and after careful consideration,
they are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, the defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack
of prosecution [Doc. No. 54] is denied. A new scheduling order will follow.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of November 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?