Clark v. Robertson et al

Filing 70

ORDER adopting in their entirety 68 the findings and partial recommendation; granting 43 defendants Mitchell Jones's and Robert Reichard's motion for summary judgment; dismissing without prejudice Clark's claims against Jones and Reichard, for failure to exhaust; and further certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/22/2018. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
SEYOUM ALI CLARK
ADC# 120783
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 1:16-CV-00083 BSM

BRADLEY HOWARD ROBERTSON, et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
The findings and partial recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge
Patricia S. Harris [Doc. No. 68] have been received as well as plaintiff Seyoum Ali Clark’s
objections [Doc. No. 68] thereto. After careful consideration and de novo review of the
record, the findings and partial recommendation are adopted in their entirety, defendants
Mitchell Jones’s and Robert Reichard’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 43] is
granted, and Clark’s claims against Jones and Reichard are dismissed without prejudice for
failure to exhaust. It is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken
in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of January 2018.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE