Hudson v. Reichard et al
ORDER adopting as supplemented 7 recommendation. Hudson's claims against ADC are dismissed with prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. This case is returned to Magistrate Judge Harris for further proceedings. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/30/2016. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
REICHARD, Doctor, Grimes Unit;
SIMMIONS, APN, Grimes Unit;
CHARLES LIGGETT, Doctor, Ouchita
River Unit; GATLIN, Ms, Grimes Unit; and
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTION, Grimes Unit
Unopposed recommendation, NQ 7, adopted as supplemented. FED. R.
CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). The Arkansas
Department of Correction isn't a" person" subject to suit under§ 1983. Brown
v. Missouri Department of Corrections, 353 F.3d 1038, 1041 (8th Cir. 2004) (per
curiam). Hudson's claims against the ADC are dismissed with prejudice. An
in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). This case is returned to Magistrate Judge Harris for
- ---------·-·-·-·---·--·--·····-·-·-· · · - -·--·--··-·-··--
- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?