Burke v. Kelley et al

Filing 12

ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety the 7 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's finding in all respects; dismissing without prejudice Defendants Kelley, Williams, Day, Griffin, ADC, and Correct Care Solutions; directing the Clerk of the Court to amend the docket to reflect the correct spelling of Defendant Wendy Kelley; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/19/2016. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION STANLEY K. BURKE, ADC # 151700 v. PLAINTIFF No. 1:16CV00098-JLH-JJV WENDY KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants Kelley, Williams, Day, Griffin, ADC, and Correct Care Solutions are DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. The Clerk of the Court amend the docket to reflect the correct spelling for Defendant Wendy Kelley. 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED this 19th day of September, 2016. __________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?