Humble v. Does
ORDER adopting in all respects 16 the partial recommended disposition; granting in part and denying in part 12 defendants' motion to dismiss; dismissing plaintiff James Humble, Jr.'s claims against the unidentified Doe Defendants. Defe ndants' motion is granted with respect to Humble's non-mental health claims against all defendants and the motion is denied with respect to his mental health claims against all defendants. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/8/2017. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JAMES HUMBLE, JR.
CASE NO: 1:16CV00117 BSM
DOES, et al.
The partial recommended disposition [Doc. No. 16] submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris has been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After
careful consideration, the partial recommended disposition is hereby adopted in all respects.
Accordingly, plaintiff James Humble, Jr.’s claims against the unidentified Doe defendants
are dismissed and defendants’ motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 12] is granted in part and denied
in part. Defendants’ motion is granted with respect to Humble’s non-mental health claims
against all defendants and the motion is denied with respect to his mental health claims
against all defendants.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of May 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?