Humble v. Does

Filing 28

ORDER adopting in their entirety 27 the proposed findings and recommendation; granting 21 defendants' motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and dismissing Humble's claims, without prejudice; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal of this order and judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/10/2018. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
JAMES HUMBLE, JR.
ADC #117144
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 1:16-CV-00117 BSM

A. SCHUBERT, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

Plaintiff JamesHumble has not objected to Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris’s
proposed findings and recommendation [Doc. No. 27]. After carefully reviewing the record,
the proposed findings and recommendation are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, the
defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 21] is granted for failure to exhaust
administrative remedies, and Humble’s claims are dismissed without prejudice. It is further
certified that an in forma pauperis appeal of this order and judgment would not be taken in
good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of April 2018.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE