Humble v. Does
ORDER adopting in their entirety 27 the proposed findings and recommendation; granting 21 defendants' motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and dismissing Humble's claims, without prejudice; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal of this order and judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/10/2018. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JAMES HUMBLE, JR.
CASE NO. 1:16-CV-00117 BSM
A. SCHUBERT, et al.
Plaintiff JamesHumble has not objected to Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris’s
proposed findings and recommendation [Doc. No. 27]. After carefully reviewing the record,
the proposed findings and recommendation are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, the
defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 21] is granted for failure to exhaust
administrative remedies, and Humble’s claims are dismissed without prejudice. It is further
certified that an in forma pauperis appeal of this order and judgment would not be taken in
IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of April 2018.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?