Pusha v. Payne et al

Filing 11

ORDER approving and adopting the 6 Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice Mr. Pusha's claims based on his failure to state a federal claim for relief; and denying as moot the remaining pending motions 8 , 9 , and 10 . Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/24/2017. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION MYCHEL PUSHA v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 1:16-cv-134-KGB-BD KAREN PAYNE, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received and reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere (Dkt. No. 6). Plaintiff Mychel Pusha has filed objections to the Recommended Disposition (Dkt. No. 7). After careful consideration of the Recommended Disposition, Mr. Pusha’s timely objections, and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects. Mr. Pusha offers no new information in his objections that would enable this Court to discern a cognizable claim of any constitutional violation. All of the facts and contentions in Mr. Pusha’s objections were presented to and evaluated by Judge Deere before she made her determination and submitted the Recommended Disposition. Therefore, the Court dismisses without prejudice Mr. Pusha’s claims based on his failure to state a federal claim for relief. The Court denies as moot the remaining pending motions (Dkt. Nos. 8, 9, 10). So ordered this 24th day of August, 2017. ____________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?