Thurman v. Queen et al

Filing 14

ORDER adopting 5 Partial Recommendation and overruling 11 Thurman's objections. Thurman's claims against Stephen Williams, Inman, Day, Barbara Williams, Payne, and the Doe Defendant are dismissed without prejudice. Thurman's claims for damages against Queen, Downing, and Spurlock in their official capacities are dismissed with prejudice. His excessive-force claims against Queen, Downing, and Spurlock can go forward. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/8/2016. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
EDWARD THURMAN
ADC# 084186

v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 1:16-cv-146-DPM-BD

QUEEN, Sergeant, NCU; DOWNING,
Lieutenant, NCU; SPURLOCK, Sergeant,
NCU; STEPHEN WILLIAMS, Warden, NCU;
BILLY INMAN, Deputy Warden, NCU;
KEITH DAY, Building Mayor, NCU;
DEXTER PAYNE, Deputy Director, ADC;
BARBARA WILLIAMS, Inmate Grievance
Supervisor, ADC; and
JOHN DOE, Corporal, NCU

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
On de nova review, the Court adopts the partial recommendation, NQ 5,
and overrules Thurman's objections, NQ 11 .

FED.

R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).

Thurman's claims against Stephen Williams, Inman, Day, Barbara Williams,
Payne, and the Doe Defendant are dismissed without prejudice. Thurman's
claims for damages against Queen, Downing, and Spurlock in their official
capacities are dismissed with prejudice. His excessive-force claims against
Queen, Downing, and Spurlock can go forward.

So Ordered.

D .P. Marshall Jr. I/
United States District Judge