Radford v. Williams et al
Filing
37
ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety the 35 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; directing the Clerk to amend the docket to reflect the full names of Defendants Kendall Drinkard and Billy Inman; granting Defendants' 32 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's cause of action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/2/2017. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
JESSIE RADFORD
ADC #655432
v.
PLAINTIFF
1:16CV00151-JLH
STEPHEN WILLIAMS, Warden,
North Central Unit, ADC; et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff=s Objections.
After carefully
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that
the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.
The Clerk amend the docket to reflect the full names of Defendants Kendall
Drinkard and Billy Inman. Document #21 at 1.
2.
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Document #32.
3.
Plaintiff’s cause of action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust
administrative remedies.
4.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 2nd day of August, 2017.
_______________________________________
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?