Brown v. McCormick et al

Filing 72

ORDER adopting 45 Partial Recommendation. Defendants' motion and amended motion to dismiss, 19 & 27 , construed as a motion for summary judgment, are denied. The Court on de novo review adopts the 59 Partial Recommendation and overrules Brown's 60 & 66 objections. Brown's 51 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/2/2017. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION LESTER BROWN ADC #137598 v. PLAINTIFF No. 1:16-cv-168-DPM-JTK CODY M. McCORMICK, Sergeant, Grimes Unit, ADC; and JAMES HILL, Sergeant, Grimes Unit, ADC DEFENDANTS ORDER 1. Unopposed partial recommendation, Ng 45, adopted. P. 72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). FED. R. Crv. Defendants' motion and amended motion to dismiss, NQ 19 & 27, construed as a motion for summary judgment, are denied. 2. On de nova review, the Court adopts the partial recommendation, Ng 59, and overrules Brown's objections, NQ 60 & 66. FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b)(3). Brown's motion for summary judgment, NQ 51, is denied. So Ordered. v D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?