Brown v. McCormick et al
Filing
72
ORDER adopting 45 Partial Recommendation. Defendants' motion and amended motion to dismiss, 19 & 27 , construed as a motion for summary judgment, are denied. The Court on de novo review adopts the 59 Partial Recommendation and overrules Brown's 60 & 66 objections. Brown's 51 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/2/2017. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
LESTER BROWN
ADC #137598
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 1:16-cv-168-DPM-JTK
CODY M. McCORMICK, Sergeant, Grimes
Unit, ADC; and JAMES HILL,
Sergeant, Grimes Unit, ADC
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
1. Unopposed partial recommendation, Ng 45, adopted.
P. 72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes).
FED.
R. Crv.
Defendants' motion
and amended motion to dismiss, NQ 19 & 27, construed as a motion for
summary judgment, are denied.
2. On de nova review, the Court adopts the partial recommendation,
Ng 59, and overrules Brown's objections, NQ 60 & 66. FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b)(3).
Brown's motion for summary judgment, NQ 51, is denied.
So Ordered.
v
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?