Ashlock v. Kelley et al

Filing 36

ORDER adopting in all respects 8 25 the partial recommended dispositions; dismissing without prejudice claims against defendants Bailey and William Caldwell and all other claims, except for Ashlock's claim of inadequate treatment for Hepatitis-C, are dismissed without prejudice; and denying 13 defendants' motion to dimiss. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/8/2017. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION KEITH ASHLOCK, ADC #142034 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 1:16CV00169 BSM WENDY KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The partial recommended dispositions [Doc. Nos. 8, 25] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the partial recommended dispositions are hereby adopted in all respects. Plaintiff Keith Ashlock’s claims against defendants Bailey and William Caldwell and all other claims, except for Ashlock’s claim of inadequate treatment for Hepatitis-C, are dismissed without prejudice. See Doc. No. 8. Finally, defendants’ motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 13] is denied. See Doc. No. 25. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of May 2017. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?