Davis v. Sessions et al

Filing 10

ORDER adopting 8 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition; dismissing the 6 Amended Complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; finding that dismissal of this action counts as a strike; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 03/06/2017. (rhm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
COLLARS DAVIS
ADC #115586
VS.

PLAINTIFF

1:17CV00002-BRW

D. SESSIONS, In-house
Parole Officer, ADC; et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

I have reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. No. 8)
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After
careful consideration, I approve and adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
in their entirety.
Accordingly, the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 6) is DISMISSED without prejudice for
failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
I certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this
Order would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of March, 2017.

/s/ Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1