Davis v. Sessions et al
ORDER adopting 8 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition; dismissing the 6 Amended Complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; finding that dismissal of this action counts as a strike; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 03/06/2017. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
D. SESSIONS, In-house
Parole Officer, ADC; et al.
I have reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. No. 8)
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After
careful consideration, I approve and adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
in their entirety.
Accordingly, the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 6) is DISMISSED without prejudice for
failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
I certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this
Order would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of March, 2017.
/s/ Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?