Meadows v. Richarson et al

Filing 15

ORDER Adopting 12 and 14 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff is allowed to proceed on her excessive force claims, and her related claims regarding treatment of those injuries, against Defendants Richarson, Ward, Huges, Baisa, Bl edsoe, and Bummgartener. Plaintiff's deliberate indifference claim regarding treatment of her hepatitis C is dismissed from this action without prejudice. Defendants Correct Care Solutions and Does are dismissed from this action without prejudi ce. Plaintiff's 9 Motion for Injunctive Relief is denied. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/23/2017. (mcz) (Docket text modified on 10/23/2017 to correct the description of the document filed)(jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
TERESE MARIE MEADOWS
ADC #707979
v.

PLAINTIFF

1:17CV00056-JM-JJV

MICHAEL RICHARSON,
Captain of Security, McPherson Unit; et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Dispositions
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (ECF Nos. 12 and 14).

No objections

have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and
Partial Recommended Dispositions should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their
entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff is allowed to proceed on her excessive force claims, and her related claims

regarding treatment of those injuries, against Defendants Richarson, Ward, Huges, Baisa, Bledsoe,
and Bummgartener.
2.

Plaintiff’s deliberate indifference claim regarding treatment of her hepatitis C is

DISMISSED from this action without prejudice.
3.

Defendants Correct Care Solutions and Does are DISMISSED from this action

without prejudice.
4.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 9) is DENIED.

5.

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis

appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations would not be taken in good faith.

1

DATED this 23rd day of October, 2017.

_______________________________________
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2