Autry v. Yancy et al
ORDER adopting in their entirety 7 the proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing, without prejudice, 5 Autry's amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be grated. Dismissal of this action counts as a "strike." Furthermore, it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/10/2017. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
SHELBY JAY AUTRY
CASE NO. 1:17-CV-00058 BSM
JACK YANCY, et al.
The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 7] submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been received. Plaintiff Shelby Jay Autry has not
submitted objections. After a careful review of the record, the proposed findings and
recommendations are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Autry’s amended complaint
[Doc. No. 5] is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may
be granted. Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. Section
1915(g). Furthermore, it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in
good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of October 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?