Locke v. Williams et al

Filing 11

ORDER adopting 3 Recommendation and overruling 6 Partial Objections. If Locke wants to allege additional facts against Williams, then he must do so in a motion to amend his complaint, not in his objections to the recommendation. Locke's claims against Williams, Johnson, and Day are dismissed without prejudice. His claims against the Arkansas Department of Correction are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/17/2018. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
TYRONE EUGENE LOCKE
ADC #127715

v.

PLAINTIFF

No. 1:18-cv-21-DPM-BD

STEPHEN WILLIAMS, Warden, North
Central Unit, ADC; CHRIS JOHNSON,
Deputy Warden, North Central Unit, ADC;
MARTYW. HEARYMAN, Doctor, Correction
Care Service; SHARON RHODER, APN,
Correction Care Service; HULL, The Hull
Clinic; R. GILLIHAN, Building Captain,
North Central Unit, ADC; ARKANSAS
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; and
KEITH DAY, Major, North Central Unit, ADC

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
On de nova review, the Court adopts the recommendation, N!l 3,
and overrules Locke's partial objections, N!l 6.

FED.

R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3) .

If Locke wants to allege additional facts against Williams, then he

must do so in a motion to amend his complaint, not in his objections
to the recommendation.

Locke's claims against Williams, Johnson,

and Day are dismissed without prejudice.

His claims against the

Arkansas Department of Correction are dismissed with prejudice.

So Ordered.

v

D .P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge

-2-