Hill v. Reed et al
ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety #13 Proposed Findings and Recommendations as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice plaintiff's claims against Defendants Hancock, Mayo, Gillum, Thompson, Holcomb, Owney, Jones, and Edwards; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/7/2019. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DALE REED, Chief Deputy Director,
Arkansas Department of Correction; et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe.
(Doc. No. 13.)
No objections have been filed.
careful consideration, the Court concludes the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should
be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Hancock, Mayo, Gillum, Thompson,
Holcomb, Owney, Jones, and Edwards are DISMISSED without prejudice
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(1)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
Dated this 7th day of January, 2019.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?