Hill v. Reed et al

Filing 21

ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety #13 Proposed Findings and Recommendations as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice plaintiff's claims against Defendants Hancock, Mayo, Gillum, Thompson, Holcomb, Owney, Jones, and Edwards; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/7/2019. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION ADAM HILL ADC #601559 v. PLAINTIFF 1:18CV00089-JM-JJV DALE REED, Chief Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. (Doc. No. 13.) No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Hancock, Mayo, Gillum, Thompson, Holcomb, Owney, Jones, and Edwards are DISMISSED without prejudice 2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(1)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 7th day of January, 2019. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?