Robinson v. Crown Equipment Corp
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 175 Motion in Limine as set forth in this Order. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 3/12/09. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION JASON ROBINSON v. 2:02-CV-00084-WRW DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF
CROWN EQUIPMENT CORPORATION ORDER
Pending are Plaintiff's Motions in Limine (Doc. No. 175). Defendant has responded.1 After reviewing all pleadings, motions, and responses, I rule as follows: 1. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine Nos. 1 - 4 and 10 - 11 are unopposed by Defendant
and are hereby GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 5 to Exclude Evidence Relating to Fork Lift Tip-
Over or Off the Dock Accidents or Testing is DENIED. 3. DENIED. 4. 5. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 7 to Exclude Military Specifications is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 8 to Exclude Evidence Relating to the Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 6 to Exclude Industry Regulations/Standards is
Negligence of Plaintiff or Any Third Party is DENIED. 6. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 9 to Exclude Evidence of Inadequate Training to
Plaintiff as an Intervening Cause is DENIED. 7. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 12 to Exclude Comparative Statistical Evidence
Offered by Dr. M. Laurentius Marais is DENIED.
Doc. No. 182. -1-
With respect to Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 13 to Exclude Expert Testimony
Offered to Explain a Federal Law or Safety Standard, I reserve my ruling until trial. 9. The above rulings -- save Motion in Limine No. 13 -- are definitive.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of March, 2009.
/s/ Wm. R. Wilson, Jr.___________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?