Hunt v. Smith, et al

Filing 259

ORDER denying 250 Motion to Abstain; denying as moot 252 Motion to Substitute Document; denying 253 Motion to Correct the Record; however, the Clerk is directed to make sure the docket numbers in the hard-file accurately reflect the docket numbers on CM-ECF--specifically Doc. Nos. 82 and 83. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 2/6/08. (mkf)

Hunt v. Smith, et al

Doc. 259

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION KENNETH HUNT V. HAROLD SMITH, et al ORDER Plaintiff's Motion to Abstain (Doc. No. 250) is without merit, and, therefore DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion to Substitute Docket Entry 197, Brief in Support With Document, that Contains Numbered Pages is DENIED as MOOT. Amending the brief to add page numbers is unnecessary; however, the brief with page numbers is now in the record as Exhibit 1 to Doc. No. 252. Plaintiff's Motion to Correct the Record in Docket Entry 55, 82, 83 (Doc. No. 253) is DENIED. However, the Clerk of the Court is directed to make sure the docket numbers in the hard-file accurately reflect the docket numbers on CM-ECF -- specifically Doc. Nos. 82 and 83. Plaintiff's assertion that Doc. Nos. 82 and 83 are incorrectly dated is without merit. IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of February, 2008. 2:03CV00194-WRW DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF

/s/ Wm. R. Wilson, Jr._________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com