Patel v. Prince et al
ORDER ADOPTING 52 Partial Report and Recommendations and allowing plaintiff to proceed in this judicial district with Counts 1 through 7 but severing Counts 8 through 18 and transferring those Counts to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Abilene Division immediately; and denying 50 Motion to Sever, Transfer Case filed by Kamal K Patel. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 4/20/09. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION KAMAL PATEL, REG. #56496-080 V. E. J. PRINCE, Clinical Director, FCI-Forrest City; and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed, and the time for doing so has passed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. 1. Counts 8 through 18, as set forth in Plaintiff's Complaint, are SEVERED from this 2:06CV00217 WRW/JTR PLAINTIFF
lawsuit, and the Clerk is directed to IMMEDIATELY TRANSFER those Counts to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Abilene Division. 2. his Complaint. 3. The Clerk is directed to prepare a summons for Defendants, and the United States Plaintiff may PROCEED, in this judicial district, with Counts 1 through 7, as set forth in
Marshal is directed to serve the summons, the Complaint, and this Order upon them, the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas, and the United States Attorney General, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. 4. DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of April, 2009. Plaintiff's Motion to Sever and Transfer the Privacy Act Claims (Doc. No. 50) is
/s/ Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?