Harman v. Bill et al

Filing 66

ORDER ADOPTING Proposed Findings & Recommended Disposition 64 of U.S. Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Defendants' 46 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order & the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 9/9/08. (jct)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION JAMES LESLEY HARMAN ADC #79054 V. J.W. BELL, Kitchen Supervisor, East Arkansas Regional Unit, et al. ORDE R The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (docket entry #46) is GRANTED, and 2:07CV00136 JMM/JTR DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF this case is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE. 2. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 9th day of September, 2008. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?